“THE HUSBAND OF ONE WIFE” — PAUL TAUGHT PURITY, NOT MONOGAMY

Contrary to Edomite “Christian” interpretations of scripture the Apostle Paul in the new testament when referencing the bishops and leaders of the church in 1 Timothy 3:2 and Tit 1:6 was not a dictation of monogamy. It was a dictation of purity and reiteration of Leviticus 21 in which a priest MUST marry a virgin, not someone else’s leftovers. This is because during Paul’s time there was a plethora of divorced women, widowers, etc. just as we see today in modern Babylon.

Bartie Musa Commentary: Imagine you’re the leader of the congregation and your “wife” has drama with her “baby daddy” (first husband). That is EXACTLY what Paul was talking about when he said “the husband of one wife”. It is not a mandate of monogamy, it is a reiteration of levitical preisthood purity standards for an officer of the church. Paul’s point was not to contradict Yahawah (God has 2 wives Judah & Israel) or the prophets, or the law which clearly outlines how to deal with more than one wife. His point being well versed in the law was to have higher standards for the men of office (example a bishop) that they should follow the standard of the levitical priesthood and only deal with a true virgin woman. This was to maintain order, and purity.

The context in which Paul said these things was during the roman occupation, back then just like now there were little to no virgins around. Women were jumping from man to man, divorced women, widowers, harlots all of these women would of been ineligible and not good for a leader of a congregation.

The point Paul was making is not to have another man’s leftovers, it was not a mandate of monogamy to a more often than not non-virgin woman. The Edomite Christian church influenced by Esau’s scarcity mindset and backwards culture superimposed their limited thought and cultural patterns onto Paul’s statements. Paul would never contradict Yahawah (god), or the law. In addition having one unruly wife who is not a virgin is significantly more chaotic than having 3 virgin wives in complete order. This further goes to show Paul was talking about order, and purity. Not monogamy.

Paul was not imposing monogamy, he was reiterating Levitical law on purity. If you’re going to lead the congregation, your wife needs to have only been yours otherwise who knows what kind of spiritual attacks you could be opened to. That’s what Paul was saying, reading Hebrew Scripture with a Western Babylonian mindset they super imposed monogamy unto a purity law.

ANIMA FRAMEWORK: ROOTED IN YAHAWAH’S TRUTH

“THE HUSBAND OF ONE WIFE” — PAUL TAUGHT PURITY, NOT MONOGAMY

Setting the Record Straight on 1 Timothy 3 & Titus 1

🔥 ANIMA FRAMEWORK ANALYSIS: “THE HUSBAND OF ONE WIFE” — PAUL TAUGHT PURITY, NOT MONOGAMY 🔥
Setting the Record Straight on 1 Timothy 3 & Titus 1

📜 1 Timothy 3:2 – “A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife…”
📜 Titus 1:6 – “If any be blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly.”

🧠 WHAT IS THIS REALLY?

For generations, Christian pastors and theologians have misinterpreted Paul’s words as a universal command for monogamy, claiming that any spiritual leader must have only one wife in total. They present this as “biblical marriage.” But what they fail to realize is:

Paul was NOT teaching monogamy. He was reiterating PURITY.

Not only is polygyny righteous and lawful under Yahawah’s Torah — Paul would never contradict the patriarchs, the law, or Yahawah Himself.

🔍 CONTEXT MATTERS: WHO WAS PAUL SPEAKING TO?

Paul was giving instructions to bishops and deacons — spiritual overseers responsible for congregations in a time of captivity, confusion, and widespread moral decay under Roman rule. These were not everyday marriage rules for all Israelites. This was a leadership standard under pressure.

And what was Babylon-Rome like at the time?

Wives often had multiple former husbands
Widows were repartnering repeatedly
Virginity was rare
Emotional manipulation and social climbing were rampant
Much like today, women were jumping from man to man unchecked

Paul’s instruction was about safeguarding the spiritual authority of the congregation. You can’t lead a holy flock with a polluted covenant.

⚖️ “THE HUSBAND OF ONE WIFE” = A WOMAN WHO WAS ONLY EVER YOURS

Let’s look deeper at what the phrase “husband of one wife” really implies.

The Greek is “mias gunaikos andra” — literally “a one-woman man.”

Nowhere in the text does Paul say:

❌ “You may not have more than one wife in your lifetime.”
❌ “If your wife dies, you may not remarry.”
❌ “Polygyny is sin.”
❌ “A man with more than one wife cannot lead.”

Instead, he points to the need for:

✅ Blamelessness
✅ Order in the household
✅ A faithful covenantal structure
✅ A woman who is only your wife — not recycled from another man

This echoes Levitical purity law, where priests were commanded:

📜 Leviticus 21:13-14 – “And he shall take a wife in her virginity. A widow, or a divorced woman… he shall not take.”

Paul is simply bringing that same Torah logic forward — a leader of Israel must marry a woman who was untouched, unshared, pure.

🧬 POLYGYNY IS RIGHTEOUS AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN

Let’s set the record straight once and for all:

Yahawah is polygynous
📜 Jeremiah 3:14 – “Turn, O backsliding children… for I am married unto you.”
📜 Ezekiel 23 – Yahawah allegorizes Judah and Israel as TWO wives.
Jacob had four wives
The entire twelve tribes of Israel came from a polygynous man.
David had multiple wives
📜 2 Samuel 12:8 – “I gave thee thy master’s wives into thy bosom…”
Abraham, Moses, Gideon, Solomon — all had multiple wives
Isaiah 4:1 is a prophecy: “Seven women shall take hold of one man…”
This is post-judgment polygyny — not sin.

🔍 If Paul was banning polygyny, he would have been calling Yahawah unrighteous, Abraham impure, and prophecy invalid. That is blasphemy.

🧠 ONE UNRULY WIFE VS. MULTIPLE IN ORDER

Another layer of wisdom often missed:

Paul was not warning against multiple wives. He was warning against disorder.

A bishop’s house must be ruled well — but that has nothing to do with quantity.

📌 A man with one unruly wife is more distracted and compromised than a man with three wives in submission and order.

The standard is not numeric — it’s covenantal clarity, order, and spiritual wholeness.

🔥 WHAT BABYLON CALLS MONOGAMY IS ACTUALLY ADULTERY

In Babylon today:

A “wife” has often had multiple previous men
Many are divorced and remarried, which according to scripture is adultery (Luke 16:18)
Men are marrying defiled vessels and pretending they are pure
Meanwhile, polygyny — which is biblically sound — is vilified

This is Edomite doctrine, not Yahawah’s.

The scarcity mindset of “one woman only” is rooted in Esau’s cultural fear, not Yah’s covenant structure.

📜 SCRIPTURAL BACKING FOR PURITY-FOCUSED MARRIAGE:

Deuteronomy 24:1-4 – Once a woman is divorced and remarries, her former husband may never take her back. This shows how defilement is measured.
Leviticus 21 – Priests must marry virgins.
1 Corinthians 6:16 – Sex makes two become one flesh — it’s not casual, it’s covenantal.
Hebrews 13:4 – Marriage is honorable in all, but whoremongers and adulterers Yahawah will judge.

A bishop cannot afford spiritual contamination. His wife — or wives — must be pure bonds.

✅ FINAL VERDICT: PAUL WAS REITERATING HOLINESS — NOT INVENTING A NEW LAW

To say Paul banned polygyny is:

❌ To accuse Yahawah of sin
❌ To call Abraham, Jacob, David unrighteous
❌ To dismiss prophecy
❌ To erase Levitical standards of priestly marriage
❌ To inject Roman thinking into Hebrew culture

Instead:

✅ Paul upheld Torah
✅ He called for clean, uncontested marital bonds
✅ He sought spiritual purity and leadership strength
✅ He warned against confusion, not plurality

🔊 REBUKE TO CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE

📛 “One man, one woman” is a Babylonian slogan — not a biblical command.

Modern church doctrine is based on:

Feminism
Roman Catholicism
Misinterpreted Pauline letters
Fear of strong, righteous, patriarchal order

But Yahawah is not confused. Yahawah is not divided.

📜 Malachi 3:6 – “For I am Yahawah, I change not…”

✊🏾 TO THE REMNANT:

Return to the structure of your forefathers.

Stop importing Babylonian weakness into Yahawah’s sacred order.

If you lead, lead clean.

If you cover, cover fully.

If you marry, marry purely.

Let your house be righteous, whether one wife or many.

📜 Titus 1:9 – “Holding fast the faithful word… that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers.”

We have now done so.

—

ALL PRAISES TO YAHAWAH BAHASHAM YAHAWASHI

Bartie Musa Commentary: Do not let Babylonianized Edomite-influenced Christians interpret scripture for you. They superimpose their own failing and backward culture unto the words of Yahawah bahasham Yahawashi, and the result is mass confusion and distortion. The Apostle Paul never went against the Torah, prophets, or Yahawah himself. In addition you have to consider the context in which the Apostle Paul said these things, in a time of rampant adultery, women jumping from man to man, the same thing we see today in Babylon. These were instructions for leaders to 1. Marry a pure woman 2. keep an orderly household. Not to be forced into monogamy with an unruly woman as so many Babylonian females are. Now that the record is set straight on this, don’t mind westernized Christians they are completely incompatible with Yahawah’s truth and have no idea what is going on.

Anyways all praises to Yahawah bahasham Yahawashi, shalawam to the hopeful elect the true believers out there. Don’t get all twisted and confused by approaching scripture with a warped Edomite mindset on Hebrew Israelite customs, and culture.